🔗 Share this article

Authorities have called it as one of the largest frauds of its kind in the UK.

In all 14 people have been sentenced for their involvement in a £28m scheme to defraud over 3,500 vacation property owners.

The victims were keen to get out of age-old timeshare contracts and tried to find help.

The majority were in the age range of 60 and 80. In excess of 500 of them parted with more than £10,000, and a single victim handed over in excess of £80,000.

Those victimized were faced high-pressure consultations continuing for six hours. They were left out of pocket, owning useless fake "points" and still bound by expensive timeshare contracts they often use.

The Company At the Heart of the Scam

The company at the heart of the scheme was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They took clients' cash to fund the proprietors' luxurious lifestyle of exclusive education, luxury homes and exclusive air travel.

The leader at the helm of the organization, Mark Rowe, was given a 90-month sentence in January for deceptive scheme.

In the latest development, his wife another individual was among the last group to receive sentencing.

She was handed a two-year long deferred imprisonment at Southwark Crown Court after confessing to money laundering.

The outcome represents a long time coming and signifies a huge win for the victims who came forward, the law enforcement and prosecutors.

The Way the Inquiry Began

I first heard about the company came in the summer of 2016. The role involved in the investigations unit of a news organization, producing current affairs programmes.

A friend pointed out that his mum had assumed the rights of a timeshare apartment in a European resort and, after long-term use, had commenced searching to get out of the deal.

It is important to recall how widespread holiday ownership had evolved with UK travelers in the eighties and nineties.

Vacation properties enabled people to access the same accommodation each season, or trade their weeks with fellow investors who had properties in different locations. Approximately 600,000 vacation seekers took up that opportunity.

The first timeshare rush was accompanied by a numerous reports about rip-off merchants fraudulently marketing properties. They appeared frequently on investigative broadcasts.

The standard timeshare contract locked buyers for decades.

At that time, those owners who had enjoyed their assigned property in the sunshine for decades were getting older, and a significant number were hoping to wave goodbye to their vacation investments.

Some had declining mobility and were unable to visit their properties. Some just thought they'd enjoyed sufficient use from them. And a portion had died, in many cases leaving their heirs to take over the agreements - along with their yearly fees and upkeep costs.

The Covert Probe Progresses

It was at this point the relative had found herself. She searched the web for solutions and found SMT, a business whose website assured to release her from her deal.

But, having made a payment and arranged an appointment with them, her family smelled a rat.

Subsequent checking revealed numerous individuals saying they had paid money and got nothing from the service. Indeed, they had been left out of pocket. A lot of it.

The reporting group started looking into what was going on. It quickly became clear that there were some shady characters operating in the timeshare resale sector.

An attorney had many grievance cases waiting to sue SMT.

The team interviewed individuals who had engaged the company and they each reported similar experiences. They assumed the company would purchase their timeshare off them but when they attended a meeting (for which they submitted funds initially) they were informed there was no potential buyers.

Rather, they were persuaded - in fact compelled - to spend more money acquiring "the firm's incentive scheme", associated with the outfit's parent company, Monster Travel.

The precise definition was somewhat vague. They seemed similar to a type of exchange medium, giving access to discount travel and services and retail offers.

And they were apparently "exchangeable with additional holders, some time down the line.

Investing money immediately would result in an eventual payoff that would pay for the firm's costs and result in the investor with a gain, released finally from their pesky agreement.

An unrealistic promise? Indeed, it was.

A 'Misleading Scam'

If these accounts were correct, this was a major deception.

It's what is called a "misleading sales."

An operator - specifically SMT - "baits" the client by marketing a specific service only to then claim it is unavailable, pushing the customer to an alternative, lesser offering.

That's illegal. Equipped with all the testimony we had assembled, we presented the rationale to discreetly video one of the firm's consultations.

This takes time, effort, and clear arguments for why this is the only way to gather the information required to confirm deceptive practices.

With approval secured, our limited crew arranged a meeting with one of the organization's staff in the location.

Acting as a ordinary individual wanting to get his mum out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement