A fatal train derailment in the southern state of Oaxaca has claimed the lives of at least 13 people, an incident sure to fuel censure from critics regarding the speed and execution of the country's flagship government projects.
The disaster took place on the Interoceanic Train, a line developed to join the Atlantic Ocean and Pacific across the narrowest part of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. This endeavor was created to offer an alternative rail cargo route to the Panama Canal, intended to promote economic development in the area.
“We will rigorously clarify the reasons behind this incident,” affirmed the head of state.
The official confirmed that, of the some 250 people on board, another 98 were wounded, with five of those in grave condition. The official added plans to go to Oaxaca to meet those impacted.
Flagship Project of Previous Administration
The Interoceanic Train was a signature public works project of the previous administration, whose time in office ended the previous year. This project was closely associated with his government's developmental vision for the southern region.
Another multi-billion dollar railway undertaking from that period, a tourist and cargo loop around the Yucatán Peninsula, was also part of the comprehensive effort to kickstart the economy of a relatively less developed part of the country.
Building Management and Safety Concerns
The building of both rail lines was managed by the army, marking a dramatic expansion of its role in civilian infrastructure. They were executed at an accelerated speed, surpassing forecasts to be at least partly launched before the end of that administration.
However, this rushed timetable had also raised ongoing concerns over construction quality.
- Sunday's derailment was the third such incident on the Interoceanic Train this year.
- This involves an earlier accident this month when a train struck a truck at a crossing.
- The other major rail project has also had a couple of non-deadly derailments.
Demands for Review and Suspension
In the aftermath of the disaster, the leader of a primary political opposition urged an prompt suspension in the building and running of all such projects.
This stoppage was proposed pending a full technical review. The party emphasized that the situation "demands immediate answers."
In reaction, the national leader maintained that the train had been running in total adherence to all security protocols. Assurances were given that the government would remain "responsible" in both the construction and management of these national undertakings.
